Family Limited Partnerships: Valuation Discounts and Estate Planning

How family limited partnerships use lack-of-control and marketability discounts of 20–40% combined for estate planning, IRS risks under Section 2036, and legitimate non-tax uses.

The InfoNexus Editorial TeamMay 25, 20269 min read

Discounting $10 Million to $6 Million — Legally

A family limited partnership (FLP) can reduce the taxable value of a $10 million asset to as little as $6 million for gift and estate tax purposes — not through any accounting trick, but through the application of well-established valuation principles. When a limited partnership interest is gifted to the next generation, the recipient receives an interest that cannot be freely sold on a public market and carries no management rights. Independent business appraisers, applying methodologies accepted by IRS regulations and Tax Court precedent, routinely assign combined valuation discounts of 20–40% to limited partnership interests, reflecting these real economic limitations. The result is a powerful wealth transfer mechanism — when structured correctly.

FLP vs. LLC: Structural Comparison

Family limited partnerships and family limited liability companies (FLLCs or LLCs) serve similar planning purposes but differ in legal structure. The FLP has two classes of partners — the general partner (GP), who manages the partnership and bears unlimited liability, and the limited partners (LPs), who own economic interests but have no management rights and typically face no liability beyond their investment. The general partner interest, often just 1–2% of the total, controls all business decisions.

The family LLC operates under the same economic principles but uses managing and non-managing (or voting and non-voting) membership interests rather than GP/LP structure. In most states, LLC members have limited liability regardless of their management role, eliminating the general partner's unlimited liability exposure. For pure estate planning purposes, the FLLC has largely supplanted the FLP in modern practice — though the FLP remains common where the underlying assets are business interests or real estate that is more naturally organized as a partnership. The IRS treats both structures similarly for audit and Section 2036 purposes.

Valuation Discounts: The Core Mechanism

Two distinct discounts typically combine to reduce the value of a limited partnership interest below its pro-rata share of underlying assets:

  • Lack of Control (LOC) discount: Reflects the limited partner's inability to force liquidation, compel distributions, direct investments, or override management decisions. A 10–25% LOC discount is typical, depending on the degree of management restriction and the specific rights enumerated in the partnership agreement.
  • Discount for Lack of Marketability (DLOM): Reflects the limited partner's inability to sell their interest in a liquid market. Unlike publicly traded stock, there is no exchange where FLP interests trade. Finding a willing buyer requires significant time and marketing effort, justifying a 10–20% DLOM. The combined effect of both discounts frequently reaches 25–40% of net asset value.

These discounts are not fabricated. They are supported by empirical data from arm's-length transactions of minority business interests, published restricted stock studies, and pre-IPO studies. Qualified business appraisers calculate them using the same methodologies applied in commercial contexts — mergers, buyouts, and litigation support — not just tax planning.

IRS Scrutiny: Section 2036 and the Bona Fide Business Requirement

IRC Section 2036(a) includes in a decedent's gross estate any property transferred during their lifetime if the decedent retained the right to the income from the property or the right to designate who shall possess or enjoy it. The IRS has aggressively argued that FLPs are shams — that the general partner's retained control effectively means the grantor never relinquished the transferred property. When successful, Section 2036 arguments eliminate the discounts and include the full underlying asset value in the estate.

Two Tax Court cases define the boundaries. In Strangi v. Commissioner (2003), the Tax Court applied Section 2036 to include partnership assets in the estate because the decedent had transferred assets to the FLP on her deathbed, commingled personal and partnership funds, and continued to use partnership assets for personal expenses. In Bongard v. Commissioner (2005), the court set the "bona fide sale for adequate and full consideration" exception: transfers can escape Section 2036 if made for legitimate, non-tax business reasons and at arm's-length terms. The IRS wins when the FLP looks like a last-minute, deathbed tax maneuver. It loses when there is genuine business substance.

What Constitutes a Bona Fide Business Purpose

The bona fide business purpose requirement is not merely a box to check — it requires genuine, credible, non-tax reasons that would have motivated a reasonable businessperson to form the entity. Courts have accepted the following as legitimate purposes:

  • Centralized management of a family real estate portfolio or operating business
  • Protecting assets from the creditors of individual family members
  • Facilitating orderly succession of business ownership
  • Providing a mechanism for teaching children financial responsibility through LP interests with quarterly distribution meetings
  • Preventing undivided interest partition actions in jointly owned real estate

Courts have rejected the following as pretextual or insufficient:

  • Transferring personal investment accounts of publicly traded stocks to an FLP with no operational differences from individual ownership
  • FLPs formed when the grantor was seriously ill, months from death
  • Entities where the general partner continued to pay the grantor's personal expenses from entity accounts
  • FLPs where all annual distributions were consumed by the grantor for personal living expenses, demonstrating the entity was merely a conduit

Annual Gifting of LP Units

Once the FLP is funded, the senior generation can annually gift limited partnership units to the next generation, using the annual gift tax exclusion ($18,000 per recipient per donor in 2024) and, if necessary, the lifetime exemption. Because LP units are valued with the valuation discounts applied, each year's annual exclusion gifts can transfer more underlying asset value than would be possible with outright gifts. A gift of LP units worth $18,000 (after discount) represents perhaps $25,000–$30,000 of underlying net asset value. Over decades of annual gifting, this discounting effect compounds significantly.

YearAnnual Gift (discounted value)Underlying Value Transferred (at 35% combined discount)
Year 1$36,000 (2 donors × $18,000)~$55,000
10 years$360,000 total discounted gifts~$550,000 underlying value
20 years$720,000 total discounted gifts~$1,100,000 underlying value

Charging Order Protection

A charging order is a creditor's remedy against a debtor's partnership interest: rather than seizing the interest outright, the creditor receives a lien on distributions. The creditor cannot force liquidation or take over management rights. In most states, the charging order is the exclusive remedy against a partnership interest, meaning a creditor of a limited partner cannot reach the underlying partnership assets at all. This creditor protection feature is a legitimate, non-tax benefit of FLP and LLC structures — particularly valuable for professionals in litigation-prone fields or families with concentrated real estate holdings.

IRC 2704 and Regulatory History

IRC Section 2704(b) directs the IRS to disregard certain restrictions on liquidation that reduce FLP valuation discounts for estate and gift tax purposes. In 2016, the Treasury proposed regulations that would have dramatically curtailed FLP valuation discounts by treating intra-family restrictions as irrelevant. These regulations provoked intense opposition from estate planning professionals and were withdrawn in 2017. While the 2016 proposed regulations are no longer active, the IRS continues to scrutinize FLP valuation discounts through audit and Tax Court litigation. The legislative risk of future discount limitation remains a background consideration in long-term planning. Structure matters, and documentation matters more.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. FLP and valuation discount strategies involve complex tax and legal rules subject to IRS challenge. Consult a qualified estate planning attorney and certified business appraiser before implementing any family limited partnership strategy.

estate planningbusinesstax strategy

Related Articles